Standard costs nobody believes
Standards set once and never maintained. Every margin discussion becomes an argument about whose numbers are right.
ŌSensei (formerly Sensei FinanceOS) · Manufacturing
The close for a manufacturing business.
Standard costs you can trust, the five variances explained to $0, and inventory — raw, WIP, finished — that ties to the floor. Flash at Workday +1, hard close at Workday +5.
The close runs on a Finance Operating System I designed and built — an agent-led close, with the major workflows run by an agent I direct and review.
20+ years accounting & finance
Controller-level leadership
MAcct + MSDS
Manufacturing system built & proved
40/40 pilot checks — worked close
Flash WD+1 · Soft WD+3 · Hard WD+5
These checks are from internal pilot builds, backtested on worked sample closes. They are not client results, and no client data was used.
Founder, Sensei Advisors
JoMar Hester, MAcct, MSDS
Founder | Financial Systems Architect
Fractional CFO / Controller · ŌSensei
G1 · WD+1Backlog roll to $0 unexplained — Flash issued.
G2 · WD+3Five-variance decomposition ties to actual minus standard — $0 unexplained.
G3 · WD+3Statements tie — days inventory recomputed independently.
G4 · Audit-readyEvidence and workpapers checked to PCAOB standards.
The problem
Where manufacturing accounting breaks.
Manufacturing numbers look solid from the outside — parts, pallets, shipments. Inside the ledger, they break in predictable places, and each one surfaces at the worst time: a pricing decision, a lender review, a count that doesn't tie.
One lump called “variance”
Price, usage, rate, efficiency, and overhead blended into a single unexplained number. Nothing to fix, because nothing is identified.
Inventory that doesn't tie
Raw, WIP, and finished goods disagree with the floor. Counts become crises instead of confirmations.
Backlog and cut-off
Shipments and revenue recognized on different calendars. The backlog roll is a guess, and month-end revenue moves with it.
Product-line margins too late
Which lines make money is learned after the quarter — if ever. Pricing and capacity decisions run on stale numbers.
Working capital invisible
The cash conversion cycle and inventory days are never computed from the close. Cash sits in inventory, and nobody can say how much.
The system
Built once, for manufacturing. Run every month.
ŌSensei for Manufacturing is a complete close system — revenue, inventory, cost, and reporting — installed on your existing accounting system, whatever that system is.
Revenue, shipments & backlog
Backlog roll to $0 unexplained, and the Flash issued at Gate G1, Workday +1. Shipments and revenue on one calendar.
Inventory & COGS
Raw, WIP, and finished goods on rollforwards that tie to the floor — with count readiness built in, not bolted on before a count.
Standard cost & the five variances
Material price, material usage, labor rate, labor efficiency, and overhead — decomposed and tied to actual minus standard at Gate G2.
Product-line P&L, margin & capacity
Line margins and capacity utilization from the same close — not a separate spreadsheet built weeks later.
Production labor & payroll
Labor tied to production, not just to payroll registers — so labor cost lands where the work happened.
Treasury & working capital
Cash conversion cycle and days inventory recomputed at Gate G3, from closed books — decision-ready because the statements already tie.
Audit-ready
Designed to be audited: the PCAOB layer.
Every ŌSensei build is built to US GAAP, with SEC-reporting discipline, SOX-ready controls, and a PCAOB layer — audit evidence and workpaper discipline built to PCAOB standards.
After the close gates pass, a separate Gate G4 — Audit-Ready — checks evidence, workpapers, and review. A failed G4 blocks the words “audit-ready,” not the statements.
International
Built for US and international diligence: the International layer.
ŌSensei is one build with modular activation. Each client picks a US track or an International track — the system underneath is the same. Every standard is anchored two ways: to the FASB Codification and to IFRS Accounting Standards as issued by the IASB. FASB- and IASB-friendly by design, so a diligence team reads the same file on either side of the Atlantic — no translation.
Framework set per entity
Each entity carries its statutory framework, the group reporting framework, and its presentation currency on one register. Nothing is forced into a single framework.
The bridge close
Local statutory close first. Then the framework bridge. Then group consolidation, then the investor pack. The bridge ties with $0 unexplained — or the close does not pass Gate G5.
Instruments read both ways
SAFEs, convertibles, preferred shares, and warrants are analysed under both frameworks before signing — because the same instrument can be equity in one framework and a liability in the other.
Local rules stay local
Statutory calendars, indirect taxes, withholding, and R&D credit evidence are captured in registers, and local advisors file. ŌSensei never replaces the local statutory accountant.
5 vertical pilots482 pilot acceptance checks passedGate G5 Diligence-Ready — Pre-seed to Series C8 deliverables per vertical (IX-1 to IX-8)
In the Manufacturing pilot: inventory converted from LIFO to FIFO off the reserve — adjusted inventory $3,235,000 — while the US books and tax stayed on LIFO; intercompany profit of $240,000 eliminated.
How it starts
Two ways to engage. One fixed price.
Start with a short diagnostic. If ŌSensei is a fit, the scope, price, and outcome are fixed before we start. No hourly billing.
ŌSensei Installed
The manufacturing system installed on your existing accounting system: reconciliations, schedules, review checkpoints, responsibility matrices, recurring workflows, gates, and reporting deadlines.
ŌSensei Operated
Sensei runs the close on the installed system. The major workflows are run by an agent I direct and review; judgment, exceptions, and sign-off stay with a person.
Productized, not hourly
Fixed scope. Fixed price. Defined outcome. The price is fixed after a short diagnostic, before work starts — the same model on every engagement.
See the system
The full manufacturing system and a one-page sample of the close are available on request.
Request a sampleFounder
Built by a Controller.
The manufacturing system was designed and built by a Controller with 20+ years in accounting and finance — cost and inventory accounting at its core, public accounting at Grant Thornton, and SEC reporting work at Multi-Color, a public manufacturer, where he assisted drafting the 10-Q and 11-K and built the technical computations behind them.
MAcctMSDS20+ yearsController leadershipFinancial Systems Architecture
Start with the accounting problem
If the plant numbers are hard to trust, the system needs work.
Tell me what is happening in your accounting or finance operation. If ŌSensei is a fit, the scope, price, and outcome are fixed before we start. No hourly billing.
Prefer email? jomar@senseiadvisors.com
Or connect on LinkedIn.
Already a client? Sign in to your ŌSensei workspace.
Please do not send bank credentials, tax IDs, payroll data, or other sensitive financial information through this form.